Kathmandu, May 20

The Central Investigation Bureau of Nepal Police has filed a case of banking fraud against 148 persons allegedly involved in Apex Development Bank scam.

CIB took two months to complete the investigation and submitted its report to the Office of Special Government Attorney, Lalitpur, today.

On March 16, police had arrested 21 people, including staff, board of directors, borrowers, valuators and former chief executive officer Bishnu Prasad Dhital of the erstwhile Apex Development Bank for indulging in unethical loan releases.

According to police, arrests were made after the accused released loans amounting to Rs 1.50 billion through fake loan documents, insufficient collateral and other illegal means from the branches of Apex Development Bank located in Durbar Marg, Lokanthali, Itahari, Surkhet and Nepalgunj. Moreover, the accused are said to have been involved in fake transactions during post-merger integration between Nepal Credit and Commerce Bank and Apex Development Bank. Apex Development Bank and NCC Bank had merged a few months ago.

According to CIB, of the 128 bank scam files related to the case, 33 are from Itahari, seven from Surkhet and 13 from Nepalgunj.

CIB went through 85 files before filing a case based on the findings of those files.

According to police officials, total amount
that was siphoned from Itahari, Surkhet and Nepalgunj branches of the bank is under investigation and it will take time to complete the investigation.

Charges against the accused have been filed as per the Banking Offence and Punishment Act, police said.

According to CIB officials, the alleged masterminds of the fraud, Govinda Upadhyaya and Basanta Malla, are hiding in the United States of America. CIB plans to request the Interpol to issue a diffusion notice against them.

READ ALSO:

• CIB nabs 13 former Apex Dev Bank officials on charges of fraudulent transactions

The post CIB books 148 for Apex Development Bank scam appeared first on The Himalayan Times.

Kathmandu, May 20

In a major precedent setting verdict, the Supreme Court has ordered that an airlines company bears the responsibility of compensating passengers if flight is delayed due to negligence of the company.

In a compensation case filed by mediaperson Ghamaraj Luitel against Yeti Airlines Pvt Ltd, the SC upheld Patan Appellate Court’s September 23, 2010, verdict in which it had ordered the company to pay a compensation of Rs 1,000 to Luitel against the claim of Rs 126,000. The SC prepared the full text of the verdict today.

Luitel had filed a case at Compensation Committee under Consumer Protection Act, stating that he was supposed to fly with  Yeti Airlines from Biratnagar to Kathmandu  at 3:00pm on March 8, 2007, but he could  fly only at 5:00pm and suffered monetary loss due to delayed flight.

He also stated that on March 1, 2007, when he was scheduled to fly with Yeti Airlines at 9:00am, he reached TIA for the Biratnagar bound flight at 8.30am, but the flight had already taken off.

Although the Compensation Committee quashed Luitel’s case on June 17, 2009, Patan Appellate Court upheld it on September 8, 2010.

The SC stated that while an airlines company’s decision to delay a flight due to a situation beyond its control could be justified, the company’s decision to change the flight schedule recklessly could not be justified. “There must be a reasonable ground to change scheduled flights,” the apex court stated in its verdict.

It observed that the passenger was not given prior information about change in the flight schedule. “It is the primary duty of the airlines company to operate flights on scheduled time. Schedule should not be changed and if it has to be changed in unavoidable circumstances, the passengers should be informed of the same,” the SC observed in its verdict. It added that the airlines company could not claim that it had the power to change flight schedule just to gain benefit.

The court directed the government to fix the amount of compensation for unjustified changes in flight schedules. It told the government to prepare criteria for qualitative air travel.

Yeti Airlines had argued that there was no law that could obligate an airlines company to pay compensation for delayed flights and in this case, the passenger had not followed the terms and conditions of the flight ticket. The SC observed that the company had not stated the terms and conditions clearly.

The post Airlines to pay for flight schedule change appeared first on The Himalayan Times.